|
Comments: 20 | Prop Total: -163 | Avg: -8.15
|
|
| Photo | Video | News | Wall | |
|
(August 26, 2008 at 0:42)
(Below Threshold) show comment
He rolled out of it... |
|
A V-10 isn't actually worth $10000. Thats the retail. This bike was probably made as a concept by santa cruz so it cant really be concidered a waste of a bike |
|
I see what you mean but i think its got something more to do with the lenses. Looks like a 28mm. Gives the sense of depth rather than a tele does. You can see the shadows from his wheel on the fence so hes hasnt just been put in there with PS. I really like the lighting on it |
|
Its fine. Really oversharpened but its good all the same |
|
Pops sooooo well. One or two flashes? |
|
12ft lightstand to get over the wallride? |
|
haha your all dicks. Almost every POD is photoshopped. This one is pretty bad though. over sharpening the rider, blurring the background |
|
Haha its not yellowish enough. read my post dumbshit |
|
|
To bad its a ass shot. Those trees could have looked sick if this was shot side on with a tele. Usually I dont like vrey saturated shots but this could do with more |
|
|
Well how did I get to -39 prop for probly the most constructive and legit comment on here |
|
|
Shovel is distracting. Too much dead space at the top. Rider has good style. Crop the shot in and itll look way better |
|
Its real nice. If it wasn't a ass shot itd be awsome. Fair hop aswell, props. Flash to ambient ratio is nice but the background seems a little green. Bad WB? |
|
|
|
|
I think this had potential. The problem is not enough light on the body. Power up another flash on either the right of the rider and use it as a rim light or place it at the bottom of the bank. The rider blends in too much with the background. Besides that the compositon is spot on. |
|
|
|
Its not POD worthy. Its a snap shot |
|
It's a sick shot but not POD worthy. Technically it sucks and dosent really jump out at you. The Shot that was posted on ILMTB of the same spot is way better |
|
RSS
